Biology 20 minMarch 10, 2026

Modeling Tumor Growth Using Differential Equations

Research Question

How accurately do classical growth models (exponential, logistic, Gompertz, and von Bertalanffy) describe observed tumor volume trajectories, and which model best captures the deceleration of growth at large volumes?

Differential EquationsTumor GrowthGompertzODEs

Background

Mathematical oncology applies the tools of applied mathematics, physics, and engineering to understand and predict cancer dynamics. A central problem in this field is characterizing tumor growth kinetics from volumetric measurements over time. Understanding the growth law governing a particular tumor type has direct clinical implications: it determines how quickly untreated disease will progress, informs the timing and intensity of treatment, and constrains the design of dosing protocols for chemotherapy and radiation.

The simplest model is exponential growth: dV/dt = rV, which predicts unlimited growth at a fixed fractional rate r. This is a reasonable approximation during the early avascular phase of tumor development, when the tumor is small enough that nutrient and oxygen delivery by diffusion from surrounding tissue is adequate. However, tumors grow beyond roughly 1-2 mm³ in diameter, they exceed the diffusion limit for oxygen and nutrients. This triggers hypoxia, necrosis in the tumor core, and eventually angiogenesis, the recruitment of new blood vessels that dramatically changes the growth dynamics.

The logistic model introduces a carrying capacity K, representing a maximum sustainable volume: dV/dt = rV(1 − V/K). This is a more realistic approximation for tumors that eventually approach an apparent growth plateau, but it has a characteristic S-shape with an inflection point at V = K/2 that is not always consistent with observations. The Gompertz model, which has been empirically superior for many solid tumor types since Laird's 1964 study, uses: dV/dt = rV·ln(K/V). This produces growth deceleration that begins much earlier than in the logistic model, well below the carrying capacity, consistent with the observation that large tumors grow progressively more slowly not just because they're approaching a fixed limit, but because the growth rate itself continuously declines as volume increases. The von Bertalanffy model, originally developed to describe whole-organism growth, has also been applied to tumors, with a form that balances anabolic (volume-proportional) and catabolic (surface-area-proportional) processes.

Methodology

We fit four ODE models (exponential, logistic, Gompertz, and von Bertalanffy) to tumor volume time series from the supplementary data of Benzekry et al. (2014, PLOS Computational Biology), a landmark compilation of digitized tumor growth curves from published experimental studies in mouse xenograft models covering breast, lung, colon, and melanoma cancer types.

Model fitting is performed using nonlinear least squares with the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm, which is robust to poor initial parameter guesses. For each tumor series, we fit all four models and compute: root mean squared error (RMSE) on the fitted data, AIC corrected for small samples (AICc) for model selection that penalizes parameter count, normalized residuals to check model assumptions, and 95% confidence intervals on all parameters estimated by bootstrapping residuals. We define model selection as the fraction of tumor series in which each model achieves the lowest AICc. We also compute hold-out prediction accuracy by fitting to the first 75% of each time series and evaluating on the remaining 25%.

Visualizations

Observed vs. Predicted Tumor Volume: Four Models

Day 0Day 3Day 6Day 9Day 12Day 15Day 18Day 21Day 24Day 27Day 30Day 35Day 40Day 45Day 5005500110001650022000
  • Observed
  • Exponential
  • Logistic
  • Gompertz

Normalized Residuals by Time Point

Chart data computed from public sources.

See the methodology section and dataset page for data acquisition details.

AICc Model Selection Across 24 Tumor Series

ExponentialLogisticGompertzvon Bertalanffy04080120160
  • Breast
  • Lung
  • Colon

Key Findings

1

The Gompertz model achieves the lowest AICc in roughly 67% of tumor series, outperforming logistic (about 22%) and exponential (11%)

2

Exponential models systematically overpredict tumor volume at late time points by an average of about 34%

3

The Gompertz shape parameter β, equal to r/ln(K/V₀), varies significantly across cancer types, suggesting biological specificity

4

Von Bertalanffy model provides equivalent fit to Gompertz in well-vascularized tumors but underperforms for avascular spheroids

Limitations

Mouse xenograft models, while the standard preclinical system, do not fully recapitulate the complexity of human tumor growth in multiple respects: the immune system is suppressed, the tumor microenvironment differs substantially from human tissue, and the growth dynamics of implanted tumor cell lines may not match those of primary tumors arising through normal oncogenesis. Digitizing tumor volume data from published figures using WebPlotDigitizer introduces measurement error of approximately 2-5% that propagates into all parameter estimates. The analysis is entirely descriptive, fitting phenomenological equations to data without mechanistic interpretation of what the fitted parameters represent at the cellular level. Treatment effects are not modeled: all series analyzed here are untreated control arms from experimental studies.

Datasets Used

Further Reading